data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89805/8980569cabdee891de4c20021ea7414dce302149" alt="Microsoft windows for mac 2011"
#Microsoft windows for mac 2011 keygen#
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55280/55280748e7ac553e7030200e09e8c018c1b9170b" alt="microsoft windows for mac 2011 microsoft windows for mac 2011"
Windows salts too many features away in dialog boxes and tabs, but has a handy button for testing settings before you finalize them Mac is better-organized, but doesn’t have the test button. They’re fundamentally different, and each has its pros and cons. (Microsoft’s press story touches on this.) That certainly explains some of the disparity between the Offices, but not all of it. It’s fascinating, for instance, to compare Outlook 2011 for Mac’s interface for adding accounts with the one in Outlook 2010 for Windows. With Mac apps, the assumption is always that users want interfaces that are “Mac-like” rather than warmed-over Windows. The developers of Office 2011 appear to have ignored this research. I attended an Office 2010 workshop in which Microsoft staffers explained how user research taught them that the Ribbon needed to be less visually cluttered than the original version, which is why the 2010 edition removed the outlines from icons. (I’m not even going to address the fact that the Office Web Apps have a third variant of the Ribbon interface.) You can turn off the toolbar or the Ribbon–or both, for that matter–but you can’t make the interface look anything like its Windows cousin. Well, Office 2011 still has menus and toolbars–in fact, there’s no way to get rid of the menus, and both the old-style toolbars and the Ribbon are turned on by default, leading to an odd user interface with multiple levels of redundancy. When Microsoft shipped Office 2007, it explained that it wasn’t technically feasible to retain traditional menus and toolbars, at least as an option. The two versions have different tabs, different icons arranged differently–they’re just different. I say “a Ribbon” because it’s not the Ribbon from Office for Windows. Office 2011, on the other hand, has a Ribbon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e3cd/6e3cd80e94a6da9bfdf08b3d6e269be7e8338745" alt="microsoft windows for mac 2011 microsoft windows for mac 2011"
Office 2008, for instance, came out a year after Office 2007 for Windows, yet it pretty much spurned the Office 2007 Ribbon–it did hint at it in a roundabout way–even though Microsoft had been busy pitching it as a much-needed revolution. It’s created by a Mac-specific group within Microsoft that isn’t part of the Office team, and which seems to be authorized to go its own merry way. One of the fascinating things about Office for Mac is that it isn’t really the same product as Windows incarnation of Office at all. Microsoft’s press site has a story that seems designed both to reassure Apple fans that Microsoft loves them and Microsoft fans that it doesn’t love Apple fans that much. (I was known to run a virtualized copy of Windows on Macs mostly so I could use Windows Office.)įor some people, the fact that Microsoft–a company who has been known to deride Apple’s customers as trendy spendthrifts–still makes Office for the Mac is apparently hard to reconcile. That wasn’t a given: I mostly avoided its predecessor, Office 2008, which was slow and not only lacked the Ribbon but had a floating-palette interface I actively disliked. The company provided me with a pre-release copy a few weeks ago, and when I’ve been using a Mac I’ve been running Office and mostly enjoying the experience. Microsoft’s Office 2011 for the Mac goes on sale today–the first version to support Office’s Ribbon interface, the first one in years with Outlook, and one that’s priced to move.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89805/8980569cabdee891de4c20021ea7414dce302149" alt="Microsoft windows for mac 2011"